144k views
2 votes
Reread the following section.

But in the main, I feel like a brown bag of miscellany propped against a wall. Against a wall in company with other bags, white, red and yellow. Pour out the contents, and there is discovered a jumble of small things priceless and worthless. A first-water diamond, an empty spool, bits of broken glass, lengths of string, a key to a door long since crumbled away, a rusty knife-blade, old shoes saved for a road that never was and never will be, a nail bent under the weight of things too heavy for any nail, a dried flower or two, still a little fragrant. In your hand is the brown bag. On the ground before you is the jumble it held—so much like the jumble in the bags, could they be emptied, that all might be dumped in a single heap and the bags refilled without altering the content of any greatly. A bit of colored glass more or less would not matter. Perhaps that is how the Great Stuffer of Bags filled them in the first place—who knows?

Question
How does Hurston craft an effective conclusion?
Select one:
a. She restates her claim and reasons.
b. She identifies and refutes a counterargument.
c. She engages the reader by using the second person (you, your).
d. She introduces convincing evidence to support her main points.

User Velis
by
6.8k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

Hurston concludes the text effectively by using second person point of view to create a reflective and personal experience for the reader, emphasizing the similarities among diverse human experiences.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the provided text, Hurston crafts an effective conclusion by engaging the reader through the use of second person narrative ("you, your"). This technique implores readers to visualize themselves in the scenario, creating a personal connection with the content.

The conclusion does not simply restate the claim or introduce new evidence; rather, it reinforces the theme presented earlier in the text and encourages reflection. The concept of a "Great Stuffer of Bags" suggests that individual differences may be superficial when compared to the collective human experience, an interpretation which resonates as one contemplates the passage.

By not altering the jumble significantly when refilling the bags, Hurston hints at the underlying similarities among people.Hurston crafts an effective conclusion in this passage by engaging the reader using the second person (you, your). She invites the reader to imagine themselves holding a brown bag and dumping its jumbled contents on the ground. This creates a sense of connection and involvement, making the conclusion more impactful and memorable.

Therefore answer is a. She restates her claim and reasons.

User Chavdar Slavov
by
7.6k points