Final answer:
The second implication for persuaders regarding 'Man of Measure' involves recognizing human nature, adapting strategies to context, addressing counterarguments, and incorporating future-focused rhetorical techniques to enhance persuasion effectiveness.
Step-by-step explanation:
The second implication for persuaders in the context of "Man of Measure" pertains to the effectiveness of persuasion rooted in considerations of cause-and-effect reasoning and understanding human nature, as reflected through strategies such as the ultimatum game or rhetorical devices anticipating the future. Specifically, persuaders must account for the human nature revealed by the ultimatum game that highlights nuanced behaviors beyond simple rational models of decision-making. Furthermore, the inclusion of consideration for how context matters in decision-making, especially in political scenarios, suggests that persuaders should adapt their strategies based on the situational variables at play.
Additionally, addressing and anticipating potential counterarguments is crucial to building a robust persuasive argument. Acknowledging the opposition's perspective not only strengthens the persuader's credibility but also aids in constructing a more convincing narrative. The references to cause-and-effect reasoning and tactical acknowledgment of potential changes that may not be popular but must be accepted are indicative of strategic planning in persuasion.
Lastly, the use of productive rhetorical techniques, like looking to the future, empowers persuaders to give audiences insights that might inspire change or action. This future-focused conclusion functions as a potent tool in persuasion by aiding the audience to envision the outcomes and imparting a sense of urgency or importance to the argument presented.