174k views
1 vote
In the late 1880s, the development of all of the following provided powerful weapons for use against the activities of organized labor except:

a. ex parte proceedings.
b. yellow-dog contracts.
c. labor injunction.
d. antitrust laws.

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

In the late 1880s, the development of ex parte proceedings, yellow-dog contracts, labor injunctions, and antitrust laws provided powerful weapons for use against the activities of organized labor. However, antitrust laws did not directly target organized labor. The answer is option D.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the late 1880s, the development of all of the following provided powerful weapons for use against the activities of organized labor:

  1. Ex-parte proceedings: Ex-parte proceedings are legal proceedings that take place in the absence of the opposing party. While they may have been used in some cases related to labor disputes, they are not specifically designed as weapons against organized labor.
  2. Yellow-dog contracts: Yellow-dog contracts were agreements that prohibited employees from joining unions as a condition of employment. They were a common tactic used by employers to discourage unionization and restrict labor rights.
  3. Labor injunction: Labor injunctions were court orders that restricted or prohibited certain activities by labor unions, such as strikes or picketing. They were frequently used by employers to suppress labor movements.
  4. Antitrust laws: Antitrust laws were enacted to prevent the formation of monopolies and promote fair competition. While they may have indirectly impacted labor organizations, they were not specifically developed as weapons against organized labor.

Therefore, the correct answer is d. antitrust laws, as they did not directly provide powerful weapons against the activities of organized labor.

User Eliocs
by
7.8k points