Final answer:
The statement is false as the Anti-Federalists believed the Constitution gave too much power to the National Government, not too little. They feared potential overreach and a lack of protections for state sovereignty and individual rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that most opponents of ratification believed the new Constitution gave too little power to the National Government is false. In fact, opponents, known as Anti-Federalists, argued that the Constitution granted too much power to the federal government at the expense of the states. They feared that the new strong central government could overreach and undermine the autonomy of state governments and individual liberties. Concerns included the potential for a political aristocracy, heavy taxation, and the absence of a bill of rights.
Patrick Henry, a prominent Anti-Federalist, articulated these concerns by criticizing the centralized taxing powers and the creation of a potentially powerful executive. Despite these objections, Federalists assured that the Constitution's system of federalism provides a balance between state and federal powers, and the ratification was eventually successful, with Virginia and New York joining after the Bill of Rights was promised.