Final answer:
Americans disagree over government securing the promotion of happiness/welfare due to differing opinions on the role of government in providing for its people's general welfare. Some argue that government interventions such as national medical insurance and welfare benefits are expensive and destroy individual responsibility, while others believe that government assistance is necessary for citizen well-being. This debate is evident in issues like the Affordable Care Act and income redistribution.
Step-by-step explanation:
Americans disagree over government securing the promotion of happiness/welfare due to differing opinions on the role of government in providing for its people's general welfare. Some argue that government interventions, such as national medical insurance and extensive welfare benefits, are expensive and destroy individual responsibility, while others believe that government assistance is necessary to ensure the well-being of citizens.
For example, the Affordable Care Act, also known as "Obama Care," sparked fierce debates over the government's role in providing health care services and mandating health insurance for all citizens. Additionally, the issue of redistributing income to achieve greater equality also generates reluctance among some in the United States.
These debates reflect different priorities in dividing the national budget, with some advocating for larger social benefits and a smaller military budget, while others support a larger military budget and limited social benefits, leading to a "guns versus butter" dilemma.