Final answer:
The narrative paradigm emphasizes the role of narrative coherence and the symbolic significance of human communication, suggesting that good reasons encompass more than just logical argumentation but also the social and moral context within which they are situated. It contrasts with the rational-world paradigm by incorporating emotions and values as critical components of persuasion and moral judgment.
Step-by-step explanation:
The narrative paradigm's logic of good reasons differs from the rational-world paradigm's logic of reasons in that it suggests what is persuasive and believable is not just based on facts and figures, but also on the values, emotions, and experiences of individuals. This is rooted in the philosophical propositions by thinkers such as David Hume, who argued that morality is based on sentiments and not merely on facts. Plato also hinted at the complexity of understanding good, suggesting that the concept only appears after a thorough engagement with knowledge.
Morality and the good are depicted as more than just adherence to laws or empirical facts; they are interconnected with telos and the fulfillment of a goal. The narrative paradigm places importance on coherence, and on how an individual's experiences and storytelling can lead to convincing reasons for action. It acknowledges the human proclivity towards motivated reasoning, where individuals construct their understanding of the world through narratives that align with their pre-existing beliefs, rather than solely on objective evidence.