Final answer:
Performance criteria should be rated based on expectations and standards relevant to the specific subject or genre, coupled with performance goals and objective evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
All performance criteria should be rated based on a comprehensive understanding of the expectations and standards associated with a particular subject or genre.
In the context of film reviews, for example, evaluators take into account the specific genre to determine the relevant criteria, which differ between a romantic comedy and a horror movie.
For instance, audience expectations for storytelling and character development may differ vastly between these genres. Likewise, in the workplace.
A 360-degree performance appraisal involves getting feedback from various stakeholders, including supervisors, customers, colleagues, and even the employees themselves, to provide a well-rounded assessment of performance.
Beyond the specific context, performance evaluations often incorporate a review of goals set for a particular period and how the individual's performance aligns with these objectives.
Providing objective evidence to support the evaluation criteria is essential in substantiating any performance review judgment. It is important to recognize that criteria are fluid, and that consistency within the same genre is not always maintained.
Additionally, in educational settings, consideration of student performance factors such as attendance, ability, and work ethic might be used as criteria, reflecting a competitive grading system.
However, this can contrast with a more collective approach where grades are averaged, illustrating a shift in the evaluation criteria used to determine success.