Final answer:
The claim about citizens randomly dying from clearing wilderness hexes is false; it could be a game reference and does not reflect real-world situations. Environmental impact from land-clearing is serious but does not cause immediate random deaths. Environmental policies strive to balance development and conservation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that citizens will randomly start dying if too many wilderness hexes are cleared is false. It seems to be referencing a concept from a game or hypothetical scenario rather than reality. In the context of real-world Social Studies, the removal of wilderness areas can have significant environmental impacts, such as loss of biodiversity, disruption of ecosystems, and possibly contributing to climate change. However, the immediate random death of citizens as a direct cause of land-clearing is not a documented or realistic outcome.
Careful management of the environment and natural resources is crucial for the health and sustainability of human populations, but there are many factors to consider. This includes how land is cleared as well as the measures taken to mitigate any environmental damage. The dislocation of communities and destruction of ecosystems can have long-term negative effects on people's lives, but these do not usually result in instant random fatalities. Environmental policies and land management practices aim to balance human development with conservation efforts.