Final answer:
It's true that communication messages can sometimes be viewed as undesirable outputs, as they may not resonate with certain audience segments or may invoke a negative reaction if they deliver bad news or suggest sacrifice. Achieving effective communication that considers personality types and mitigates biases is essential, particularly in the democratic process where it influences public awareness and action.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that some communications messages can be seen as undesirable outputs is true. Various factors, such as human personality, psychology, and the inherent bias in media, play a significant role in how messages are received and interpreted. When the message does not resonate with an audience, particularly due to differences in personality types, such as the xSFx types mentioned, it may fail to grip and therefore become an undesirable output. Furthermore, messages that contain bad news or suggest sacrifice could backfire if not communicated effectively, becoming undesirable due to the negative reactions they inspire.
Poor judgment in communications can lead to severe consequences, as seen in the examples where subjects of electronic communication suffered because of such judgments. The evolution of the media also highlights the issue of communications being perceived negatively due to accusations of mind control and bias. Effective communication is crucial, especially in a democracy where it drives public awareness and political issues, underlining the importance of reaching a broad audience without turning them off.