Final answer:
Albert Beveridge and President Harrison believed in an imperialistic vision for America, focusing on limited rights for non-whites and economic policies like protective tariffs to strengthen the nation. In contrast, Anti-imperialists and President Cleveland advocated for self-determination and lower tariffs to foster competition and benefit consumers.
Step-by-step explanation:
In summarizing the differing views on how to protect and strengthen America, Senator Albert Beveridge and President Benjamin Harrison represented an imperialistic approach. Beveridge backed policies that limited the extension of constitutional rights to nonwhites and territories like the Philippines and Puerto Rico, suggesting their assumed incapability of self-government, paralleling domestic racial policies of the era.
Meanwhile, Harrison's administration promoted the Era of Good Feelings, endorsing a strong federal government and economic development through protective tariffs, the Second Bank, and key Supreme Court decisions that expanded federal power. Contrarily, Anti-imperialists and President Grover Cleveland harbored different perspectives.
Anti-imperialists opposed the expansionist policies and the notion of American exceptionalism that justified such imperialism, emphasizing instead democracy and self-determination. Cleveland's stance on tariff reform was also distinct in seeking lower tariffs to benefit consumers and encourage international competition, diverging from protective economic measures linked to imperialistic views.