Final answer:
The study on the computer dance related to the ideal choice and matching hypothesis is not detailed in the provided information. The survey of 3,274 people about technology preferences provides insights but does not pertain to a study on computer dance. The large sample size is generally adequate, but the representativeness of the survey determines the accuracy of the reflected percents for the broader U.S. population. Studies on software for stroke patients illustrate another aspect of research methodology.
Step-by-step explanation:
The study aimed at testing the ideal choice and matching hypothesis in relation to computer dance is not explicitly referenced in the provided information. However, I can provide insight based on the details given. A survey involving 3,274 people born after 1971 indicates patterns in computer equipment investment and self-perceived computer savvy. Such data might inform studies on technology adoption or user behavior, but they do not directly relate to the study of computer dance.
Regarding the sample size, a survey of 3,274 individuals can be considered sufficiently large for this type of study. The size allows for statistical significance and the ability to generalize findings to a broader population, assuming the sample is representative. The accuracy of the percents reported in reflecting the U.S. population depends on the sampling method and representativeness. If the survey's demographic mix accurately mirrors that of the microprocessor generation in the U.S., it's possible that the percents would offer a reliable estimate. On a gut feeling basis, without further information, it's difficult to assess whether these figures would be higher or lower for the actual population.
As for the separate reference to a study on a software program designed for stroke patients, this indicates how specific interventions can be analyzed for effectiveness. Again, this is not related to the computer dance study but highlights a methodological approach to healthcare research.