Final answer:
The restrictions of the third step of the GDL program are unspecified here, but the concept of 'No additional restrictions' implies that individuals have passed earlier phases with more limitations and are no longer subjected to new legal or technological constraints. The broader context of legal discrimination by the government is acceptable for reasonable justifications like safety and health.
Step-by-step explanation:
The student is asking about the restrictions that apply to the third step of the Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) program. This program exists to help new drivers gain skills and experience gradually. The GDL program includes several restrictions through its various steps to ensure safety and proper learning. However, regarding the phrase 'No additional restrictions', if this refers to a specific policy or context within the GDL, it means that once individuals reach the third step of the GDL program, there are no further legal terms or technological measures applied that would restrict the licensee beyond what has already been established in the previous steps. This is in contrast to earlier steps which might include restrictions like a curfew, passenger limits, or mandatory supervision.
However, let's also consider broader legal principles where government discrimination is mentioned. Laws and regulations can set different standards and requirements for different groups, such as age minimums for smoking or drinking and criteria for obtaining a driver's license. The equal protection clause is meant to ensure that everyone is treated the same under the law. Nonetheless, the government can impose laws that lead to different treatment if there is a sufficient and reasonable justification, often regarding public welfare, safety, or health concerns. These are legal forms of discrimination that are established to serve a greater good and are considered different from wrongful discrimination based on characteristics such as race, gender, or religion.