Final answer:
The difference between Von Thünen's Model and Burgess's model lies in their scopes: Von Thünen's focuses on agricultural land use based on transportation costs to markets, while Burgess's is an urban sociological model that describes land use based on social organization within a city.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Difference Between Von Thünen's Model and Burgess's Model, The key difference between Von Thünen's Model and Burgess's Model lies in their focus and application within the field of human geography. Von Thünen's Model is an economic theory that predicts agricultural land use based on distance to markets and cost of transportation.
It suggests a series of concentric rings around a central market city, with different agricultural activities optimized at each ring due to varying transportation costs for dairy, fruits, vegetables, and grains. This model remains relevant today despite technological advances like refrigeration and rapid transport affecting its operation.
On the other hand, Burgess's Model, also known as the Concentric Zone Model, is an urban sociological model that describes urban land use. It organizes a city into concentric rings with distinct zones such as the inner city, zone of transition, working-class housing, suburbs, and exurbs.
This model reflects the social organization of a city, as opposed to Von Thünen's focus on agricultural land use. Transportation costs, urban markets, and agricultural commodities are central to Von Thünen's Model, while Burgess's Model deals with urban zoning and the social ecology of cities.