Final answer:
The logical conclusion is that the wreckage of an unidentified craft is present at a local army base and the army is not commenting on it. The specifics about the wreckage, including its origin and the reason behind its damage, are not clarified in the passage, leaving several possibilities open.
Step-by-step explanation:
A logical conclusion from the last three paragraphs of the passage suggests that some sort of wreckage is indeed being held at a local army base; however, the specific details surrounding this wreckage are not clear.
The passage describes the refusal of the army to comment on the wreckage, an observation of damaged craft resembling a UFO inside a hangar, and the reporter being told to 'mind his own business' when inquiring further. These elements form the basis for multiple interpretations, none of which can be definitively proven with the information given.
While one could speculate that the army might be covering up an incident involving an unidentified craft, there is no conclusive evidence to support this. The presence of scientists and a pilot gesturing to the damaged part of the craft can imply some form of analysis or debriefing taking place, potentially hinting at an engagement with an unknown aerial object.
Yet, without further evidence, these remain speculations that fit within historical patterns of UFO reports often being associated with earthly explanations or unresolved due to lack of substantial evidence.