105k views
1 vote
If a tin of sardines creates a noxious odor for non-sardine-eaters equivalent to $1 per tin, the government could correct the odorous externality and achieve an efficient outcome by

a. taxing sardine tins at a rate of $1 per tin.
b. subsidizing sardines tins at a rate of $1 per tin.
c. capping total sardine consumption at 1000 tins per day.
d. banning sardines.

User Vykunta
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

To address the odorous externality from sardine tins, the government could impose a $1 tax per tin, effectively internalizing the external cost and leading to a more efficient market outcome (a).

Step-by-step explanation:

If a tin of sardines creates a noxious odor for non-sardine-eaters equivalent to $1 per tin, the government could correct the odorous externality and achieve an efficient outcome by taxing sardine tins at a rate of $1 per tin. This approach aligns with economic principles that suggest taxing polluting goods is a more flexible and cost-effective method to address pollution than command-and-control regulation.

By imposing a tax that is equivalent to the negative externality, you effectively incorporate the external cost into the price, leading the market to self-adjust and reduce the externality. This is similar to the concept of a pollution tax, like the refundable charge for returning recyclable cans and bottles, which provides an incentive to reduce littering.

User Ftdysa
by
8.0k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.