Final answer:
Each American has the option to buy jeans or contribute towards asteroid protection. The dominant strategy depends on the number of people who choose each option. If many others give to asteroid protection, contributing towards asteroid protection is the dominant strategy.
Step-by-step explanation:
In this scenario, each of the 100 million Americans has two options: to buy a pair of jeans or to contribute $100 towards asteroid protection. The probability of an asteroid being deflected is equal to the proportion of Americans who contribute towards asteroid protection. Additionally, each American attaches a value of $1 to a 1% increase in the chance of asteroid deflection and a value of $100 to buying jeans instead of contributing towards asteroid protection.
To determine which strategy is dominant, we need to compare the payoffs for buying jeans and contributing towards asteroid protection based on the number of people who choose each option.
If few others give to asteroid protection, buying jeans would be a dominant strategy for each American because the value attached to jeans is $100, which is higher than the potential value attached to asteroid protection.
If many others give to asteroid protection, contributing towards asteroid protection becomes a dominant strategy for each American because the value attached to a 1% increase in the chance of asteroid deflection ($1) is higher than the value attached to buying jeans ($100).
Therefore, the correct statement is:
b. Giving to asteroid protection is a dominant strategy for each of the 100 million Americans provided many others also give to asteroid protection.