Final answer:
The fallacy in the statement is the 'hasty generalization fallacy,' where the individual made a sweeping decision to not do further business with a company based on a single negative experience of a back-ordered item.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement, "I tried to buy a portable heater from the Saber Company last winter, and it was back-ordered. After a month, I just canceled and decided not to do any more business with them." contains the hasty generalization fallacy. This fallacy occurs when someone makes a sweeping conclusion based on limited or insufficient evidence. In this case, the individual decided to stop doing business with the company based entirely on one negative experience, without considering other factors such as the company's general reliability, customer service, or the possibility that the back-order was an isolated incident not reflective of the company's typical performance. The fallacy in the given statement is known as "Hasty Generalization." This fallacy occurs when a conclusion is drawn from insufficient or biased evidence. In this case, the person had a negative experience with one product from Saber Company, and based on that single experience, they generalize that all business with the company is undesirable.