Final answer:
The fallacy in the statement is an ad hominem attack, discrediting the speaker based on presumed New Age beliefs instead of their argument's merits. The choice between 'Wholistic' or 'holistic' is deemed irrelevant, which is a distraction from the speaker's attributes or arguments.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement reflects a reasoning fallacy known as an ad hominem attack. Rather than engaging with the actual content of the speaker's argument or the facts they're presenting, the speaker is discredited due to an assumption about their beliefs in "crystals and pyramids" being associated with New Age thinking. This type of fallacy occurs when someone's argument is dismissed based on some irrelevant personal trait or supposed belief, rather than the merits of their argument.
The use of either "Wholistic" or "holistic," in this context seems to be dismissed as irrelevant, which is distracting from the actual attributes or arguments of the individual. The statement under scrutiny commits a fallacy by implicitly equating the speaker's interest in New Age topics with a lack of credibility or worthiness of being heard.