Final answer:
Yes, it is true that different methods of definition can influence attitudes through connotations and evaluative stances embedded in the language used to define a subject.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is true that definitions by example, definitions by synonym, and analytical definitions can all be used to evoke an attitude about the thing being defined. These methods can carry connotations that influence readers' or listeners' perceptions, potentially weaving in positive or negative attitudes towards the subject at hand.
For instance, providing a definition by example, such as "All men like football...", employs a sweeping generalization that might suggest a culturally biased perspective on men's interests.
Offering a definition by synonym could involve framing the subject in light of another with similar meaning but differing implications, which can subtly alter attitudes. Analytical definitions aim to break down the concept into its core components, and can reflect the definer's perspective or bias through the emphasis on certain aspects over others.
Through an integrated process of evaluating, revising, and refining definitions, a more precise meaning can emerge. However, in doing so, one's underlying evaluative stance often becomes part of the definition, indicating what is considered essential to the concept and revealing the definer’s perspective. This inclusion is not just about the factual information but also how the speaker or writer perceives and values the concept, which in turn can affect the audience's attitude towards it.