Final answer:
Smaller states were worried about losing equal representation and autonomy, and becoming subordinate to larger states under the new Constitution. They feared a strong federal government might lead to tyranny and heavy taxes. To aid ratification, the Federalists agreed to consider adding a bill of rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
The smaller states had several worries when the Constitution was being formed. One key concern was the relative power of the state and federal governments. Small states like Delaware were in favor of equal representation in the Senate, as it provided a degree of equality with larger states. They also saw a strong federal government as better able to defend them. However, they were concerned about being overshadowed by more populous states, losing their autonomy, and fearing that a strong central government could lead to tyranny similar to British rule pre-independence.
The question of representation was critical, with small states vs. large states at the center of the debate. The smaller states were satisfied with the traditional structure of equal representation, but they also saw the need for a government that could regulate commerce and maintain order. The Federalists and Anti-Federalists were divided over issues such as the power of the national government and the apportionment of legislative representatives. To ensure ratification from larger states like New York and Virginia, the Federalists agreed to consider adding a bill of rights as amendments to the Constitution.
Moreover, the smaller states were concerned about the absence of clearly delineated rights, potential for higher taxes, and the likelihood of being dragged into wars by a more powerful federal government with an army. The need for clearly delineated rights almost derailed the ratification process, which was eventually resolved by agreeing to add a bill of rights as amendments to secure the necessary support for ratification.