Final answer:
Debate on defense spending is polarized between those who consider it "too high," arguing it affects social programs and could escalate global tensions, and those who believe it is "not enough," viewing robust military funding as crucial for national security and global stability.
Step-by-step explanation:
The debate over defense spending often involves two contrasting positions: those who believe spending is "too high" and those who think it is "not enough." Proponents of the "too high" interpretation argue that excessive defense spending diverts funds from vital social programs, potentially undermines economic stability, and fosters a military-centric approach to international relations. They may also believe that high spending could lead to an arms race and increased global tensions. Conversely, the "not enough" viewpoint is supported by individuals who feel that in times of global uncertainty, a well-funded military is essential for national security, protecting interests abroad, and maintaining a balance of power. This group may argue that threats such as terrorism and geopolitical rivalries justify an increase in defense budget.