The statement that does not support the explanation for how planets formed by accretion of particles is as gravity pulls the nebular disk inward, the disk spins faster. Option 3 is correct.
This assertion runs counter to the idea of angular momentum conservation. A rotating system (such a nebular disk) should rotate faster as it contracts because of the conservation of angular momentum.
Thus, the proper statement would be that the nebular disk spins faster as gravity pushes it inward, which is in line with the ideas of angular momentum conservation. The given statement suggests the reverse, which is inconsistent with what is typically observed when celestial bodies originate.
Therefore, option 3 is correct.
The complete option are :
Which statement does not support the explanation for how planets formed by accretion of particles?
As the mass of a particle increases, so does its gravitational influence.
Particles frequently collide with one another at rapid speeds.
As gravity pulls the nebular disk inward, the disk spins faster.
Frequent collisions turned rocks to dust, pushing the dust deeper into space.
Particles rotate in the same direction as the nebular disk