Final answer:
The final steps in memory forensics methodology typically involve an assessment of the results for reasonableness, discussion of memory errors, and the attribution of such errors to factors such as distortion or interference. Final conclusions and further research questions are then developed.
Step-by-step explanation:
The last three steps in a 6 step memory forensics methodology are typically centered around final analysis, validation, and the presentation of findings. These steps might include checking if the answer is reasonable, discussing encoding failure, and comparing and contrasting memory errors and amnesias. However, based on the information provided, the last step mentioned is specifically to check whether the answer is reasonable in the context of memory-related tasks. This could involve assessing the consistency of the answer in regards to the type of cognitive assessment administered, such as the three-word recall test or the reverse order recitation of months.
It's also important to consider the attribution of memory errors, including distortion, forgetting, and intrusion as identified by Daniel Schacter. In a broader context, the final steps may include drawing conclusions about the reliability of memory, such as the challenges with eyewitness testimony and the impacts of different types of interference on memory retention.
Ultimately, these steps involve a thorough assessment and understanding of the memory tests and their implications on the subject's cognitive health or memory accuracy. Suggestions for further research might include more in-depth examination of memory errors or exploring other memory assessment methods.