Final answer:
Management by Exception-Passive provides a balance of autonomy and control by allowing freedom until problems arise, thus it is more effective than the highly hands-off Laissez-Faire style which risks lack of progress.
Step-by-step explanation:
Management by Exception-Passive is considered somewhat more effective than Laissez-Faire leadership behavior because it sets a basic framework for managers to intervene only when standards are not met, which ensures that some organizational controls are in place. This approach contrasts with Laissez-Faire leadership, which is highly hands-off, allowing much freedom for employees but risking a lack of direction and progress if employees are not sufficiently self-motivated and mature.
An example of Management by Exception might be a manager setting performance thresholds and only stepping in when employees fall short or encounter exceptional situations that require managerial decision-making. In contrast, a Laissez-Faire leader might simply provide resources like an art teacher providing materials but offering no guidance or criteria for successful completion, possibly leading to aimless project pursuit or lack of cohesion.
The effectiveness of these styles can vary based on the nature of the team and organizational goals. However, for most traditional work environments, having a minimal level of managerial oversight helps maintain focus on objectives and performance standards, avoiding the pitfalls of unguided or unproductive efforts.