Question

Arturo drove through an intersection without looking and hit Vincent's car that he had driven into the intersection without obeying a stop sign. Arturo sued Vincent. The jury found that Arturo's fault contributed 20 percent to the collision and determined that his total loss was $100,000. Under comparative negligence, the jury should award Arturo:

a. $20,000.
b. $80,000.
c. $100,000.
d. nothing.

Answer 1

The jury should award Arturo $80,000.

Step-by-step explanation:

Comparative negligence is a legal principle used in tort law to determine the degree of fault or responsibility of each party involved in an accident or injury. This principle is applied when more than one party is deemed to have contributed to the harm or damages, and it allows for a fair allocation of liability based on each party's proportionate level of fault.

Under comparative negligence, the jury should award Arturo a proportionate amount based on their determination of fault. Since the jury found that Arturo's fault contributed 20 percent to the collision, he would be eligible for 80 percent of the total loss. Therefore, the correct answer is b. $80,000.