Final answer:
The utility companies' claim presupposes that converting to renewable energy sources will eventually lead to lower operation costs and financial stability when compared to the volatile prices of nonrenewable sources, making it less risky despite the higher initial investment. Option E
Step-by-step explanation:
The utility companies' claim about the benefits of renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power presupposes that the necessary technology for conversion to these energy sources is not more expensive over the long term than the technology required for energy production through combustion of nonrenewable sources.
These companies posit that renewable energy sources, after the initial capital investment, will lead to stable, low-cost energy supplies and present less financial risk compared to nonrenewable sources such as gas, oil, and coal, whose prices fluctuate significantly with market conditions.
The presumption does not necessarily imply that the public must universally embrace renewables (although that would likely be beneficial), that no new fossil fuel deposits will be found, or that weather patterns remain consistent (although consistent weather would benefit the predictability of wind and solar performance).
Of the options provided, the closest underlying assumption is that obtaining energy from renewable sources would be less risky in the long term despite high upfront costs. Option E