42.0k views
4 votes
William Marbury does not have the option to seek a writ of mandamus from the Supreme Court because

User Ploppy
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

In Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court ruled that William Marbury did not have the option to seek a writ of mandamus from the court because his case should have begun at the federal district court level. The Court also declared that the clause of the Judiciary Act of 1789 granting the Court power over mandamus cases was unconstitutional.

Step-by-step explanation:

In Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court ruled that William Marbury did not have the option to seek a writ of mandamus from the court. The Court determined that Marbury's case should have begun at the federal district court level and then could have been appealed to the Supreme Court if necessary. The clause of the Judiciary Act of 1789 that gave the Court original jurisdiction over mandamus cases was deemed unconstitutional, expanding the Court's power beyond what was defined in Article III of the Constitution.

User JimClarke
by
8.9k points