Final answer:
Kant's arguments about actions that are not universalizable can be critiqued in two examples: lying. Critics argue that there may be situations where these actions can be justified.
Step-by-step explanation:
Kant's arguments about actions that are not universalizable can be critiqued in two of his examples. One example is the act of lying. Kant argues that lying is not universalizable because if lying became a universal law, trust and communication would break down, leading to the end of civilized life.
Another example is the act of committing. Kant argues that is not universalizable because if everyone chose to end their lives, there would be no human race left to act upon.
However, there are some criticisms of Kant's arguments. Some critics argue that there may be situations where lying can be justified, such as in cases of self-defense or extreme suffering.
These critics believe that Kant's strict moral principles do not consider the complexity of ethical dilemmas and the context in which actions are performed.