Final answer:
Redemptive stories and American Exhibitionism relate to the manner in which the U.S. has historically portrayed itself. While the notion of American Exhibitionism may apply, it is false that Southern redeemers wished to maintain Republican control in the South—they sought Democratic power. The veracity of American self-portrayal versus foreign portrayals is complex and subjective.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that Redemptive Stories translate a deep and abiding script of what historians call American Exhibitionism is not directly supported by facts presented in historical resources and is likely a subjective interpretation. However, it is false that Southern redeemers hoped to preserve Republican rule in the South, since Southern redeemers actually sought to restore Democratic control and overturn the reconstruction efforts. The concept of American Exhibitionism can be seen in the ways the United States has presented itself historically, such as the notion of manifest destiny as illustrated in the belief that Americans had a divine right to settle the West, as well as in the romanticization of expansionist history through mediums like theater.
Stories set in history, such as those during the Romantic Period or later depictions of American expansion, often aimed to kindle national pride while possibly glossing over less savory aspects of history such as the disenfranchisement and displacement of Native Americans and the reliance on slave labor. This selective memory can be seen as a form of American Exhibitionism, creating a narrative that emphasizes American exceptionalism.
The extent to which United States' self-depictions or Soviet depictions of American life are accurate is a complex issue and depends on the specific claims and evidence considered. Nonetheless, the ways in which nations tell their stories, including the United States, are essential for national identity but might not always align with historical evidence.