Question

The SITUATIONIST critique argued that personality attributions were essentially common errors in stereotyping, figments in the minds of observers (and personality psychologists), and that behavior is

best predicted instead by the exigencies of concrete situations. TRUE or FALSE

Answer 1

The situationist critique that personality attributions are errors and that situational factors best predict behavior is TRUE, highlighting the concept of situationism and fundamental attribution error.

Step-by-step explanation:

The critique referred to in the question is associated with the concept of situationism, which contends that behavior is highly influenced by the concrete situations rather than being solely a result of personality traits or dispositions. This perspective is supported by research in social psychology that emphasizes the fundamental attribution error, where observers tend to overvalue dispositional factors for someone else's behavior, underestimating the influence of situational factors. In contrast, when explaining their own behaviors, people are more likely to consider situational factors. This bias highlights the discrepancy in how we perceive the causes of our actions versus those of others. The statement that the situationist critique argues that personality attributions are common errors and that behavior is best predicted by situational factors is TRUE.