Final answer:
The Supreme Court has not granted the press an absolute right to interview inmates at any time; instead, the Court has acknowledged freedom of the press while also recognizing its limits in the context of confidentiality, fair trial rights, and national security.
Step-by-step explanation:
The claim that the Supreme Court ruled that the press has the right to interview inmates anytime they want is not accurate. The Court has recognized freedom of the press as a fundamental right under the First Amendment but has also set limitations especially when it comes to the confidentiality of sources, as seen in Branzburg v. Hayes, or in matters of national security, as illustrated by the Pentagon Papers case. Furthermore, there are procedural safeguards established in cases like Miranda v. Arizona that protect against self-incrimination during custodial interrogations. It is important to note the Court's role in balancing the rights of the free press and other competing interests such as fair trial rights and national security.