Final answer:
Laws granting police the right to use deadly force are typically contained within statutory law and are informed by case law, but these laws have been scrutinized for disparities in their application, particularly involving minority groups. High-profile cases and resulting racial tensions have sparked debates regarding police practices and the need for reform to ensure the equal application of justice.
Step-by-step explanation:
The laws that provide peace officers the authority and justification to use deadly physical force against a person committing a felony can vary by jurisdiction but are generally grounded in statutory law and case law. For example, the Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio established the right for police to stop and frisk individuals when they have a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, yet this case did not specifically address the use of deadly force. Policies and laws regarding the use of deadly force typically include the principle that such force can be used when an officer reasonably believes it necessary to prevent death or serious harm to themselves or others.
Discussions concerning the use of force by police raise concerns about racial disparities and the unequal treatment of minority groups. Cases like those of Eric Garner, Breonna Taylor, and George Floyd have ignited debates and protests regarding the application of these laws and the apparent racial disparities present in their enforcement. Situations in which officers are not prosecuted for the use of deadly force in contentious circumstances continue to perpetuate issues of unequal justice and racial tension. This raises questions about the need for reform in law enforcement practices, training, and accountability.