Final answer:
Courts consider evidence that was not obtained through formal agency procedures by applying exceptions like good faith and inevitable discovery. Quasi-judicial hearings in civil cases and specific statutory provisions also guide how such facts are treated.
Step-by-step explanation:
When courts handle facts found without formal agency procedures, they evaluate the evidence based on standard exceptions to typical legal protocols. One such exception is when police execute warrants with a good faith belief that they were properly granted, only to find out they were not; another is the inevitable discovery exception, where evidence would have ultimately been uncovered through lawful means. Additionally, in civil cases, entities like boards of zoning appeals often conduct quasi-judicial hearings, which may involve sworn witness testimony and are subject to court review. In any case where a formal procedure was sidestepped, handling of these facts often depends on the specific jurisdiction and circumstances. State and federal courts differ with the latter having a more defined scope of authority, especially concerning constitutional issues and matters of federal law.