Final answer:
The number of motions to remit a bond allowed within three years after final judgment varies by jurisdiction and is governed by procedural rules to prevent abuse of the system. The reference in the question does not clearly pertain to modern legal bond procedures.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question appears to delve into a legal process, possibly relating to court procedures or judgements. In a legal context, a motion to remit a bond typically involves a request to return the bond money after a judgment has been satisfied or overturned - a situation that arises in areas such as bail in criminal cases or in civil disputes where a surety bond may be posted.
Without specific jurisdictional context, it's difficult to provide a universally accurate answer to the number of motions to remit the bond allowed 'within three years after final judgment'; laws and court rules vary widely. However, legal systems typically have procedural rules that limit the number of motions in order to prevent abuse of the legal system.
The provided reference to an artist and the Holy Tribunal does not offer clear insight into modern legal procedures regarding bonds, as it seems to relate to a historical verdict pertinent to a specific case, which may be more aligned with art history or cultural studies rather than law.