Final answer:
Jurors must refrain from discussing the case before it concludes to ensure impartiality and a decision based solely on the evidence presented. This approach protects against premature judgments and supports the integrity of the legal process, fulfilling the requirements of the Sixth Amendment.
Step-by-step explanation:
Jurors are expected not to discuss the case amongst themselves before the trial is finished to maintain an unbiased and impartial deliberation. Prior to a verdict, jurors should only be influenced by evidence presented during the trial, ensuring no premature judgments are formed. This aligns with the Sixth Amendment which requires jurors to be free from prejudices and to arrive at a verdict based solely on the facts presented within the courtroom, avoiding outside influences and media attention that could compromise their neutrality.
Once the lawyers from both sides have made their closing arguments and the judge has given instructions, jurors enter into deliberations where they discuss the case in secret, striving for a unanimous decision. If after extensive deliberation a unanimous decision cannot be reached, this may result in a mistrial, requiring the case to potentially be retried.