Final answer:
Scientific phenomena can be complex, especially when they are outside of normal human experience or when their study lacks systematic research. Theories in physics help to explain such phenomena, and clarity in communication along with scientific evidence are the pillars of understanding these occurrences. Debates like those on climate change illustrate the necessity of aligning discussions with scientific evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Understanding complex phenomena is essential in the field of science. For phenomena that have been observed in specific locations but lack a systematic study, it is crucial to refer to scientific literature for insights (references to Eisen, Neerinckx, MacMillan, Andrianaivoarimanana, and Schneider). When addressing phenomena that seem extraordinary, such as those involving very large or very fast objects, we bridge the gap with theoretical frameworks like physics, which elucidate occurrences outside normal human experiences.
Another key concept in scientific communication is explaining phenomena in terms that are easily understandable and relatable, ensuring clarity and enabling easier dissemination of information. The short-to-long principle can be used to write sentences that progress from simple to complex, aiding comprehension. Furthermore, when phenomena are attributed to supernatural causes, scientific rigor demands that evidence must support such claims to validate their legitimacy.
Debates surrounding certain phenomena, like climate change, showcase the dichotomy between skepticism and scientific consensus. It is imperative to equip such discussions with scientific evidence to foster understanding and guide responses, especially when the phenomena have wide-reaching impacts on Earth and society.