Final answer:
The IPG section that addresses infractions based on players' intended actions focuses on the nature and intent of the acts rather than just their consequences. This includes serious violations like cheating, which are penalized more severely to maintain the game's integrity. The IPG ensures fair and ethical play by outlining rules and penalties for such intentional infractions.
Step-by-step explanation:
The section of the IPG (Infraction Procedure Guide) that deals with infractions resulting from the intended actions of a player typically pertains to violations where intent plays a significant role. Such infractions are assessed not only on the basis of their outcome but importantly on the nature of the act itself and the intentions behind it. As the passage suggests, these are situations where consequences are not the sole criterion – the focus is on the act and the actor's intent.
Instances that fall within this category include deliberate cheating or game manipulation, where the actor has a clear intention to gain an advantage or disrupt the fairness of the game. In contrast to infractions that consider consequences, which might lead to corrective actions or penalties based on the extent of damage caused, infractions assessed by the intentions are often met with more severe responses regardless of whether the intended outcome was realized or not. This approach underscores the ethical perspective that some acts are wrong in themselves, regardless of their outcomes.
The IPG elaborates on the specific rules and the associated penalties for such infractions, ensuring that the integrity of the game is maintained. It educates and guides judges and players alike on how to handle situations where the game’s rules are intentionally broken. In competitive play, preserving fairness and a positive environment is crucial, and thus, understanding the IPG’s stance on intention-based infractions is essential.