Final answer:
Non-purposeful intimidation in sports can result from athletes using performance-enhancing technological innovations such as body hair removal, bodysuits for swimmers and cyclists, or advanced sports equipment. These practices aim for efficiency and competitive edge, not to intimidate, but can have an unintentional intimidating effect on competitors.
Step-by-step explanation:
Examples of non-purposeful intimidation in sports may occur when athletes or coaches engage in behaviors that can be perceived as intimidating without intentionally trying to scare or bully others. For instance, the practice of shaving body hair by swimmers and cyclists is primarily aimed at reducing drag and improving performance, not to intimidate competitors. However, the sight of a highly streamlined athlete could have an unintentional intimidating effect on others.
An example within the realm of athletic attire is the use of full bodysuits. Athletes like Cathy Freeman, who wore a full body suit during the 2000 Sydney Olympics, did so to minimize resistance and enhance their performance. While these suits are designed for aerodynamic or hydrodynamic efficiency, their appearance could create a sense of non-purposeful intimidation among competitors, as they showcase an athlete's commitment to gaining any legal advantage provided by technological advancements.
Furthermore, innovation in sports equipment such as the redesign of golf ball dimples is intended to improve the game rather than intimidate. Nevertheless, athletes using the latest and most advanced equipment might inadvertently convey a psychological advantage over competitors who may not have access to similar technologies.