Final answer:
The claim that a salesperson is entitled to a jury trial for alleged license law violations is FALSE. Such matters are usually resolved through administrative procedures rather than criminal courts. False advertising can result in disciplinary action but typically does not involve a jury trial.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that a salesperson is entitled to a jury trial before any action can be taken if they are alleged to have violated the license law is FALSE. In the context of disciplinary actions for violations of license laws, these matters are typically handled by an administrative agency and not through the criminal justice system. The Seventh Amendment provides for the right to jury trials in U.S. federal courts in civil cases where the value in controversy exceeds twenty dollars; however, most license law violations are administrative proceedings or civil matters that don't meet the criteria for a jury trial.
It's important to understand that advertising practices are regulated to ensure that false or misleading information is not conveyed. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) vets factual claims made about a product's performance to a certain extent, allowing for puffery but not outright false facts. A salesperson found to be making false advertising claims could face legal and professional consequences, including disciplinary action, but these proceedings typically do not entail a jury trial. In cases dealing with consumer protection and false advertising, a caveat for consumers stands: caveat emptor, or 'let the buyer beware.'