Question

Privacy advocacy groups such as the Electronic Privacy Information Center- the ACLU- and the Electronic Frontier Foundation claimed that the language in the Child Online Protection Act was overly vague and limited the ability of ____ to access material protected under the First Amendment

Answer 1

Privacy advocacy groups claimed that the language in the Child Online Protection Act limited the ability of individuals to access material protected under the First Amendment.

Step-by-step explanation:

The language in the Child Online Protection Act was overly vague and limited the ability of individuals to access material protected under the First Amendment, according to privacy advocacy groups such as the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).

The Child Online Protection Act (COPA) aimed to protect children from being exposed to or violent images on the Internet. However, these advocacy groups argued that the language of the act was not clear in defining what constituted 'indecent' material, which resulted in a chilling effect on protected speech and limited the access to constitutionally protected materials.

Instead of criminalizing the transmission of such materials, these groups proposed alternatives such as web site rating systems or the use of filtering software to protect children while preserving the First Amendment rights of adults.