10.0k views
2 votes
Proponents of the Children?s Internet Protection Act argued that ____schools and libraries could elect to not implement the program

User Keysl
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The Children's Internet Protection Act requires schools and libraries to implement internet filtering to receive federal funding; however, critics argue it can lead to censorship and impacts on education.

Step-by-step explanation:

Proponents of the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) argued that if schools and libraries chose not to implement the filtering measures required by the act, they could opt out but would lose certain federal funding opportunities. This federal law was enacted to protect children from accessing obscene and harmful content on the internet while using school and library computers. However, critics of CIPA have raised concerns about censorship and the potential impact on educational resources, which ties into broader discussions about civil liberties and the role of government in regulating internet access in public institutions.

User Dallan Quass
by
7.8k points