Final answer:
The initial prosecution of Kendrick for arson would generally be handled in a state criminal court, unless it involved federal property or crossed state lines, in which case it would move to a federal court.
Step-by-step explanation:
The court that would generally handle the initial prosecution against Kendrick for starting a fire would be a state criminal court. Since starting a fire intentionally can be classified as arson, which is a serious crime, it would be addressed in the criminal justice system. The severity of the crime, considering it threatened nearby buildings and safety, would typically warrant prosecution in a state court rather than a municipal or local court.
Arson is generally considered a state-level offense, and each state has its own set of laws and courts to address criminal activities that occur within its jurisdiction. State criminal courts handle a range of offenses, from minor misdemeanors to serious felonies like arson. The decision to prosecute Kendrick in a state court is rooted in the principle of federalism, where states have the authority to regulate and enforce criminal laws within their borders.
However, it's important to note that there are circumstances under which a crime may be elevated to federal jurisdiction. For example, if the arson incident crossed state lines or involved federal property, it could then be handled by a federal court. Federal jurisdiction is typically invoked when crimes have an interstate or national impact, or if they occur on federal property.
In summary, the initial prosecution against Kendrick for starting a fire would likely take place in a state criminal court due to the nature of the offense and the localized impact. However, if specific conditions, such as the involvement of federal property, are met, the case could be transferred to a federal court.