Final answer:
A bondsman may be required to pay a bond even if valid reasons to set aside forfeiture are met, due to procedural failures or doubts about the legitimacy or timeliness of those reasons, reflecting the complexities of the bail system and responsibility of the bond issuer.
Step-by-step explanation:
Even if one or more of the seven reasons to set aside the forfeiture of bail have been met within the allowed time, a bondsman may still be required to pay the bond. This could occur due to procedural issues such as failing to properly notify the court or not following other specific legal requirements that would invalidate the timely presented reasons. Bail is set according to the accused's likeliness to flee and the type of crime, as part of ensuring a fair and sophisticated justice system under the Eighth Amendment, while also reflecting punishment and rehabilitation principles.
The bond issuer is essentially on the hook to ensure the defendant's appearance in court. If the defendant fails to appear, the issuer must fulfill the financial obligation of the full bail amount. Even if a valid reason exists, complications or doubts about the legitimacy or timeliness of the reasoning may still lead to the bondsman owing the bond to the court.