Final answer:
The incident report lacked essential details such as time of the incident, immediate actions taken, medical assistance provided, and whether the presence of the electrical cord was a known or unexpected hazard.
Step-by-step explanation:
The incident report mentioning patient M. Washington's fall due to tripping on an electrical cord should have included details about the exact time of the incident, actions taken immediately after the fall, and whether the cord was supposed to be there or if it was an unforeseen hazard. It should also document any immediate medical assistance provided and the response of the patient towards the same. Such details are critical for legal and medical records, and to improve safety measures in the facility.
For instance, the report could say: 'Upon tripping over the cord, patient M. Washington was immediately assisted by medical staff who were present at the scene, including Dr. B. Adams. A preliminary assessment of her injury was done on-site, and she was quickly transported to the emergency department for further diagnosis and treatment.' Providing these details would have made the report more comprehensive and could potentially be used to prevent similar incidents in the future by identifying and mitigating hazards.