Final answer:
The Federalist Papers, particularly Federalist No. 9, advocate for a strong federative government, with checks and balances to prevent tyranny, in contrast to Anti-Federalist concerns.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Federalist Papers, specifically Federalist No. 9, argue in favor of a strong, federative form of government. Authored by Alexander Hamilton under the pseudonym 'Publius,' this paper defends the proposed U.S. Constitution against claims that it would create an oppressive central government. Federalist No. 9 emphasizes the advantages of a union in controlling factions and the violence of factions, which is also extensively covered in Federalist No. 10 by James Madison. On the contrary, Anti-Federalists feared a strong central government could become despotic. They championed individual and state rights, advocating through the writings of authors like 'Cato' and 'Brutus' for a Bill of Rights to protect citizens.
During the Constitutional Convention, a representative explaining and persuading their state to support the new federal government would highlight the balance between state and federal powers, checks and balances, and how this new system aims to prevent a single entity from gaining too much power. The Federalist angle provides arguments to counter fears of a monolithic government by delineating the government's limited and enumerated powers and stressing the importance of a stable, unified nation.