Final answer:
A licensee is not required to comply with section 3 of the disclosure exception when there are no additional restrictions in the license that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Step-by-step explanation:
A licensee is not required to comply with the provisions of section 3 of the disclosure exception when there are no additional restrictions that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. In other words, if the license does not impose any extra terms or conditions beyond what the license permits, the licensee does not need to comply with section 3.
For example, let's say there is a software license that permits users to modify and distribute the software as long as they give appropriate credit and do not add any extra restrictions. If the license includes additional restrictions that limit the modifications or distribution in some way, the licensee would need to comply with section 3 in order to bypass those restrictions. However, if the license does not impose any such additional restrictions, the licensee is not required to comply with section 3.
In summary, a licensee is not required to comply with the provisions of section 3 of the disclosure exception when there are no additional restrictions in the license that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.