Final answer:
The Meyer et al. (2016) reference does not correspond to a specific study provided. However, in psychological research, strengths generally involve advancing knowledge and practical applications, while limitations often include biases and complexities in real-world translation. Critical assessment of methodology and context is essential.
Step-by-step explanation:
Meyer et al. (2016) appears to be a reference error since no specific study from that year with authors Meyer et al. is provided in the context. To engage with the broader topics put forward within the context, it's important to understand that research studies in psychology have both strengths and limitations which affect their contributions to the field.
Strengths of psychological research typically include advancing understanding of mental processes and behavior, the ability to form predictions, and interventions to improve mental health and organizational effectiveness, as seen in Myers and Sadaghiani's (2010) study on Millennials in the workplace. However, research like that of Kaiser and Overfield (2011) on lopsided leadership also highlights limitations such as potential biases, sampling issues, and the complexity of translating findings to real-world scenarios.
Understanding the strengths and limitations of research approaches is crucial for interpreting studies and applying their findings effectively. It is essential to critically assess each study's methodology, carefully consider the population studied, and understand the context within which the research was conducted.