Final answer:
Emma should compare case law from her own state with ABA Model Rules and its persuasive value in Pennada, research secondary sources, and use legal language that is consistent, complete, valid, and formal. She should ensure her legal argument adheres to standards expected by Pennada courts and use a writing template familiar to the jurisdiction.
Step-by-step explanation:
To continue her legal research effectively, Emma, who is a freelance paralegal, should compare the case law from her own state to the ABA Model Rules and analyze the persuasive value it might have in the State of Pennada. It's important to identify whether Pennada courts have previously been influenced by or have shown deference to the case law or legal principles from other jurisdictions that follow the ABA Model Rules. Since there is no law directly on point in Pennada, Emma should also research any secondary sources like law review articles or treatises, look for persuasive authority from other jurisdictions, especially those that Pennada courts might find influential, and consider the legal principles that underlie the case law from her own state to build a strong persuasive argument.
Moreover, Emma should confirm the relevance of her findings by ensuring that the legal argument is consistent, complete, valid, and formal, adhering to the expected legal standards for submission to the Pennada court. The goal of the legal brief she will be writing is to persuade the court to agree with her client's position by using clear and unambiguous legal language that avoids open-ended interpretations. Emma might use a writing template that's familiar to Pennada's courts and include in-text citations to support her arguments, mirroring the structure and style that the jurisdiction's legal system prefers.