Final answer:
Existential therapy is true to being compatible with evidence-based practice as it can integrate individual experiences within an evidence-based framework. Evidence for its effectiveness can include case studies and practice-based evidence that considers the unique benefits of existential approaches within real-world clinical settings.
Step-by-step explanation:
To its credit, existential therapy is compatible with the trend toward evidence-based practice. The answer to this statement is A. True. Existential therapy, which focuses on free will, self-determination, and the search for meaning, aligns with personal, unique, and subjective aspects of human experience. Proponents such as Rogers have emphasized the importance of understanding the client's perspective, which is an essential facet of client-centered psychotherapy. This does not preclude existential therapy from being integrated with evidence-based practices, as the two are not mutually exclusive. The evidence for the effectiveness of existential therapy can be presented in various forms such as case studies, qualitative research, and even quantitative research that respects the individuality of the patient.
Moreover, evidence-based medicine, according to Sackett & Rosenberg, involves integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research. This approach can incorporate existential therapy techniques as part of a holistic treatment strategy that attends to individual perspectives and experiences.
It's important to remember that practice-based evidence, highlighted by Charman and Barkham, also supports the legitimacy of treatments that may not traditionally be captured by randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the gold standard of evidence-based practice. Existential therapy may offer benefits that are recorded and validated through practice-based evidence, wherein the outcomes achieved in real-world clinical settings affirm its compatibility with evidence-based methods.