Final answer:
The claim that existentialists believe experiences of aloneness are due to making inappropriate choices is false. Existentialists, such as Sartre and Camus, emphasize freedom and responsibility in creating one's essence through choices, and the aloneness experienced is a product of this inherent freedom rather than the appropriateness of choices.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement Existentialists maintain that our experience of aloneness is a result of our making inappropriate choices is False. Existentialist thought, as developed by philosophers like Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus, centers on human freedom as the defining characteristic of our existence. Sartre famously stated that 'existence proceeds essence', which indicates that humans first exist without predefined essences or purposes and then freely determine their essence through actions and choices. While existentialists do recognize the profound sense of responsibility that comes with such freedom, it is not the 'inappropriateness' of choices that leads to a feeling of aloneness, but rather the inherent condition of being an individual in the world. This philosophy emphasizes that each of us is responsible for creating meaning in our life through our choices, and this overwhelming responsibility can lead to feelings of existential dread or aloneness, a concept Sartre refers to as 'nausea'. Moreover, existentialists acknowledge the individual's experiences of freedom and the overwhelming responsibility of shaping one's own life, which can contribute to a sense of aloneness in the universe but does not pin it to 'inappropriate' choices alone. The feeling of aloneness is inherent in the human condition, according to existentialist thought, because of the radical freedom and lack of preordained essence, not necessarily due to the nature of choices made.